Offstumped – Commentary on Indian Politics

Icon

Politics and Public Policy in India

Dear BJP Digital disengagement is not the answer

Back in the days when news was not reported in real time, transcripts were not readily available forget YouTube Videos, it was convenient for Politicians to extricate themselves from mass communication snafus by seeking refuge in  - “I was misquoted by the media” or “The media misinterpreted what I said” or “The media twisted my remarks”.

The 24×7 TV and now the Digital era has changed much of that what with Politicians most recently blaming Twitter’s 140 character limit. News filtering today of a proposed ban on blogging and twitter on policy issues by BJP leaders highlights a larger point that is being missed by the political leadership of not just the BJP but other parties as well.

It is myopic to dismiss away the rapid rise of personalized social media platforms like  Twitter as a passing  fad. The kind of Digital Internationalism we are witnessing over the events in the Middle East is a reminder that this medium is here to stay and its growth is irreversible.

It is also foolish to characterize a personalized digital megaphone like Twitter as somehow fostering a personality cult and as somehow going against a culture of joint leadership. All mass communication in politics is personality oriented albeit from a medium of one’s choosing. Fellow blogger Pragamtic_D said it right in this comment on Twitter:

Some politicians may be more comfortable with 24×7 TV Studios and Op-ed columns. Comfort with the English language might put them a distinct advantage on those media. Some others may prefer the more informal Social Medium for both its brevity, flexibility and one to one interactivity with their constituents.

Any Digital disengagement via diktats over new media is akin to an attempt to turn the clock back to the days when politics thrived on information asymmetry.   What the BJP needs is not a social media ban but a coordinated Digital Strategy so a distinction may be drawn between the Party line and an individual leader’s opinion.

We already have this undemocratic environment where in the name of consensus building Parties dont conduct internal elections,  key appointments are an outcome of backroom intrigue,  legislative freedom is stifled through strict Party line Whips and the threat of disqualification thanks to the archaic anti-defection law. By  extending this culture of gagging opinion to the digital medium political parties are making an already bad situation worse.

So what might that have Ms. Sushma Swaraj done differently in this situation ?

Ms. Swaraj made a fundamental mistake by drawing a distinction between the cattle class and the media on Twitter. By maintaining two different twitter accounts she allowed herself to be twitter baited by the media in projecting what might have been her personal opinion as the party line. It is clear that Ms. Swaraj is not personally savvy with the technical aspects of the medium and their  impact on mass communication.  A  safer and far more meaningful Digital Strategy for Ms. Swaraj would have been to use  Twitter for its natural strengths – viral and non-linear digital amplification of stated positions and opinions.

What could the BJP do differently ?

Rather than box itself into a corner on apparent contradictions it should turned this whole episode to its advantage by projecting it as an example of how vibrant and open the BJP is on debate and discussion and in embracing new media. After all there is no precedent for a  Leader of the Opposition in a Parliamentary Democracy to have used Twitter in the manner Ms. Swaraj during the J&K intervention.

It is clear that there is a spirited battle for who must lead the BJP in 2014. That battle has to be settled through an open and transparent process, ideally with a Primary of sorts. It is unfortunate that Digital Engagement is being made the casualty in that battle.

Dear BJP leaders, Digital disengagement is not the answer.  We need @SushmaSwarajBJP to tweet and tweet more. We want @NarendraModi to continue to do what he is already doing. There surely is a  yet to be claimed Arun Jaitley Twitter handle. It would not be a bad idea at all to make Twitter the Platform where Debate takes place on Decision 2014 for the BJP.

Filed under: Assam elections 2011, Assembly elections 2011, DesiPundit, Digital Citizen, Internet Hindus, Narendra Modi, Nitin Gadkari, Offstumped, Social Media Reflections

2G Spectrum Scam exposes media-politician-ngo nexus

Latest update – Correspondence between the Law Ministry, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s Office and the former Telecomo Minister A. Raja of the DMK

Latest update – Full text of the CAG Report on the 2G Spectrum scam that has lead to the resignation of the Telecom Minister A. Raja (DMK) from the Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi lead UPA Government.

Note: The Hindu has issued the following clarification on the electronic document referenced below.

A press release on the 2G scam was issued by AIADMK leader Jayalalithaa in Chennai on April 28, 2010. The Hindu is unable to verify the authenticity of a 14-page document purporting to be an official account of intercepted phone conversations and is, therefore, taking it off its website.

The UPA seems all set to score another self goal – this time on account of the 2G spectrum scandal that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has chosen to ignore for sometime now.

While most of the fury and fire on the 2G spectrum scam has focused on the DMK’s A. Raja, the expose today has also revealed a different kind of nexus – between leading media personalities and NGOs lobbying Politicians on behalf of otherwise respected Business Houses.

The Hindu today posted on its website a 14 page electronic document  comprising of scanned images of what appear to be correspondence between the CBI, CBDT and internal notes marked “Top Secret”.(This document has since been removed  by The Hindu from its website, as per clarification above).

Page 9 of that document mentions the names of several individuals including Journalists in connection with lobbying the Congress on behalf of DMK’s Kanimozhi for Ministerial berths. The references seem to follow a report from a website called Whispers in Corridors and based on what appear to be notes in an “Internal Report” summarizing telephone intercept
conversations.

To be accurate allegations in Page 9 and the rest of the pages in the electronic document are not directly substantiated nor are they authoritative on the authorship of the notes. There also is no independent validation of the authenticity of the correspondence between Government agencies listed in this electronic document.

Also mentioned in this document are instances of lobbying firms arranging for NGOs to file PILs against leading Business Houses on behalf of competition as well as attempts to lobby even the so called incoruptible Left leaders of the CPI-M.

The Hindu reported that this electronic document was released by AIDMK leader Jayalalitha.

Several documents relating to the spectrum scam, including letters written by Vineet Agarwal, former head of the Central Bureau of Investigation team that was investigating the scam, and Ashish Abrol, Joint Director of Income Tax, were released by AIADMK general secretary Jayalalithaa on April 28, 2010. The documents included internal evaluation reports of the Director General of Income Tax, New Delhi, and notes marked ‘Top Secret’ and ‘Strictly Confidential’ that referred to information obtained from tapping of telephone lines of persons suspected to be involved in the spectrum scam

The original scoop on this expose came from Gopikrishnan writing for The Pioneer.

Documents available with The Pioneer show that Central Bureau of Investigation DIG Vineet Agarwal had on November 16, 2009, sought call detail records of Nira Radia from Director General of Income Tax (Investigation) Milap Jain. “It has been reliably learnt that certain middlemen, including one Ms Nira Radia of M/s Noesis Consultancy, were actively involved in the above-mentioned (spectrum scam) criminal conspiracy,” Agarwal’s letter to Jain, seeking the detailed call records, stated.

On November 20, 2009, as per Jain’s instructions, Joint Director of Income Tax Ashish Abrol provided the details of conversation between Radia and key players in the spectrum scam, including A Raja.

“There are some direct conversations between Ms Radia and the Telecom Minister. In some other conservations, Ms Radia boasts of having helped some of the telecom operators in their efforts to obtain licences/spectrums. Ms Radia has also been in regular touch with Shri Chandolia,” confirmed Abrol to the CBI. RK Chandolia was Raja’s private secretary during the time of spectrum allocation and has since been elevated as an economic adviser in the Department of Telecommunication.

“On the basis of specific information received from CBDT, the telephone lines of Ms Nira Radia and some of her associates were put under observation after obtaining permission from the Home Secretary,” Abrol wrote to Agarwal in a letter, marked “Strictly confidential and top secret”.

“The intercept provides the conversation of the target and associates indicating laundering and structured payoffs, transactions and liaison for projects of telecom, petroleum and also the media,” the I-T Department communication to the CBI stated.

Radia’s companies are involved in consulting in telecom, power, aviation and infrastructure. These entities not only managed the media but, as per the recorded conversations, apparently tried to influence policy changes and decisions of various Government departments to suit the commercial requirements of their clients, confirmed the Income Tax Department’s investigation wing to the CBI after analysing the telephone conservations.

“From these conversations, it appears that Ms Nira Radia might have had some role with regards to the award of telecom licences. In a conversation, she guided a new telecom operator on the need to delay the inflow of funds from the overseas investor and not to give the impression to the Government that there has been any ‘windfall’ profit,” the letter added.

In the conversation details available with The Pioneer, Radia was talking about arranging huge money from abroad for Unitech Wireless, which is a major beneficiary in the spectrum scam.

According to CBI sources, Radia got information about the agency’s moves against her from her vast network in the South and North Blocks and left for London in February to avoid arrest for criminal conspiracy in the spectrum scam.

“The detailed telephone transcripts of Radia clearly show how our politicians and bureaucrats were hand in glove with the corporates in looting the public exchequer,” a top CBI official said

The CBDT meanwhile issued this statement denying it had conducted any phone tapping.

Filed under: betrayal of aam admi, DesiPundit, UPA-II Critical Appraisal

1984 Bhopal Gas Tragedy Rajiv Gandhi’s role – related tweets

  • GoM on Rajiv and Bhopal: sloppiness or cover-up?
  • The Hindu archives refute GoM’s Rajiv Gandhi claim
  • Text of Group of Ministers report on issues relating to Bhopal Gas Leak Calamity
  • GK Reddy – “PC Alexander brought facts to Rajiv Gandhi on Dec 7th before Centre intervened to secure Anderson’s release & flight to Delhi “
  • Here is The Hindu’s dust-up of archives from 1984 on G.K. Reddy’s report on safe passage to Anderson http://is.gd/cXXsG
  • Govt of India has no record of safe passage to Anderson, GoM relies on Hindu’s archives http://is.gd/cXWPP
  • So Warren Anderson goes to meet MEA Secy Rasgotra in US Embassy car along with US Embassy charge-de-affairs Gordon Streeb http://j.mp/9WogUb
  • LA Times Dec 9th 1984 reported that Warren Anderson met with MEA Foreign Secretary Rasgotra to discuss Bhopal Gas issue http://is.gd/cSgI9
  • Palm beach post 1987 reported Gordon Streeb of US Embassy spoke to MEA Foreign Secretary Rasgotra who spoke to PMO or PM himself to convince Arjun Singh
  • Full story of Anderson bail and departure from December 1987 Palm Beach Post http://j.mp/9tBmdE details of MEA interaction with US embassy
  • http://j.mp/bDhDrR not a single report of mob violence in Bhopal over gas tragedy in December 1984
  • time magazine detailed reprt on Bhopal dec 17 1984 no mention of any mob violence exposes misleading claims of Anderson’s release on Law and Order grounds, fears of mob violence http://j.mp/cEpiah
  • De-classified CIA document from 8th December 1984 on Bhopal is all of 1 paragraph, rest blanked out http://is.gd/cLsUc
  • A dispassionate reappraisal of events of late 1984 is very much in order to put Rajiv Gandhi’s cold political calculations into perspective
  • Contrast it with the fact that Rajiv Gandhi actually conducted a national political campaign even as horror in Bhopal continued to unfold 
  • Look at the flak Obama has received for going about his political routine during BP Gulf Oil crisis where nobody died
  • Guess it speaks to how independent the media was in India back in 1984  
  • Can you imagine today a landslide victory, utter decimation of opposition, absolute majority in Parliament after presiding over 5000 deaths
  • Will Historians ask why it was so important for Rajiv Gandhi to rush to polls in Dec of 1984 riding on more than 5000 deaths in < 60 days
  • In retrospect mind numbing to think that despite few 1000 Sikh deaths in Nov 1984 many more 1000 deaths in Bhopal India still went to polls 
  • Indian Express connects the dots between American pressure, Rajiv Gandhi and Arjun Singh http://bit.ly/aW0gJU
  • John Dean’s account of India stint is also fascinating for perspective into South Asian geopolitics from the mid 1980s
  • Page 20 Ambassador John Dean’s notes on India tenure http://is.gd/cKMve “telephone call from DC told to stay out of legal confrontation”
  • Dec 10th 1984 “Reagan Administration protested Anderson detention, was released to avoid undermining Indo-US relations” http://is.gd/cKMdn
  • More from 1984 “delicate negotiations between Indian and U.S. Governments” and “violation of promise of safe passage” http://is.gd/cKLIU
  • Crystal clear back in 1984 itself on who let him go – all this brouhaha on whodunit is phoney, buck stopped with Arjun Singh & Rajiv Gandhi 
  • More from Sudip Banerjee’s Dec 1984 press conference http://is.gd/cKDh7 “Anderson was released becoz he was not needed for investigation”
  • Sudip Bannerjee was the then Madhya Pradesh state government’s Information Director http://is.gd/cKD0b
  • Statement by Madhya Pradesh Government spokesperson Sudip Bannerjee from December 1984 on why Warren Anderson was let go http://is.gd/cKCFZ about 22 hours ago via web

Filed under: betrayal of aam admi, DesiPundit, Emergency Reparations, UPA-II Critical Appraisal

BJP Convention on Good Governance – Open Letter

Governance is not about running welfare schemes

Governance is about making the Institutions of the State deliver

all the time everytime for everyone

The BJP is holding a first of its kind National Convention on Good Governance at the Rambhau Mhalgi Prabodhini’s Knowledge-Excellence Centre at Bhainder near Mumbai between June 5th and and 6th 2010.

The convention was announced by former Goa CM and fellow IIT Mumba alumnus Manohar Parrikar who was also recently appointed as convenor of the BJP’s Governance cell.

The convention will be attended by Chief Ministers of BJP ruled states and others from NDA ruled states with Narendra Modi set to deliver the keynote.

Following is an Open Letter from Offstumped to the attendees of the Convention.

Dear BJP Chief Ministers and Leaders focused on Good Governance

As you get together in Mumbai to discuss Good Governance, I am reminded of a poem by an American Poet Ogden Nash.

The poem is titled “A Stitch too late is my fate” and builds on the famous proverb “a stitch in time saves nine” alluding to the Middle Class ethic of planning ahead to secure tomorrow.

I want to expand on this Middle Class ethic in the Indian Context and more specifically on why I think Institutional Reform must be the center piece of any agenda on Good Governance. I want to also highlight that without that Institutional Reform we will fail to chart the future for Young India.
  
Arun Shourieji writing in his latest book has given that profound message an Indian Context that all of us must reflect on.
 
Shourieji says that an extremely high price the country paid for starting the reforms late. And even these late reforms have taken place only in economic policy and not in administration and governance. Reforms in these fields are stonewalled because politicians don’t want to commit harakiri. One major problem before the country is the plethora of small parties who have their own narrow agendas and no national vision. Combined with the corrupt section of the business class, they derail even essential reforms. Shourie suggests that to bring about these mandatory changes, what is needed is a lobby for excellence.

There has been a lot of debate in our political world on the priorities of Government. Unlike Vajpayeeji’s NDA Government, Manmohan Singhji’s government has placed a higher priority on what it calls “Aam Admi” policies which have come at the expense of real development oriented reforms.
 
This government’s motto has been to postpone politically tough real reforms.
 
Instead this government has avoided the political challenges to pursue what at best can be called “feel good” policies by taking the easy way out of populism, thus postponing real reforms.
 
Unless we think “a stitch time in saves nine” we cannot muster the will for real Institutional reform .
 
I have no hesitation in saying that the BJP’s mission of Antyodaya cannot be realised unless there are Institutional reforms that make the system work all the time and everytime for everyone and not just the “Last Man Standing in the Queue”. 
 
It is only in a system that works all the time and for everyone can the poorest of poor be helped without being at the mercy of opportunistic politics.
 
This can only happen if Institutional Reform focuses on the areas of Economy, Local Governance and Education.
 
The UPA government has been very succesful in its pursuits of feel-good politics.
 
Thus a Right to Education bill is passed without real reform in maximizing educational opportunities for everyone through public and private means.
 
Tomorrow a Right to Food bill is being contemplated which too is aimed at making us all feel good without any real reform on the wastage and inefficiencies in the Public Distribution System.
 
Learned Policy Experts who are neutral and not associated with any political party have in recent days analyzed and exposed the fallacies of the UPA’s feel good policies.
 
Pratap Bhanu Mehtaji writing in the Indian Express has cautioned us on what he calls the diversionary tactics of the Government in ignoring Price rise and inflation which in part could have been contributed by the very same feel good policies touted by the Government from NREGA to the loan waivers.
 
Bibek Debroyji also writing in the Indian Express has also reminded us of the many failed promises of the UPA on reforms in the Food sector and how the UPA has failed accurately identify the Poor.
 
If there is one consistent message from these politically neutral experts, it is that the UPA’s feel good policies are deeply flawed and have come at the expense of real Institutional Reforms.
 
It is this postponement of reforms that has jeopardized our economic future as Pratap Bhanu Mehtaji puts it impacting not just the welfare schemes for the poor but also the costs of Education and other public services for the Middle Class.
 
Neutral experts are warning us that the Economic Success of past 2 decades the seeds of which were sown by Narasimha Raoji and which was harvested by Vajpayeeji’s government is at a grave risk on account of the UPA’s flawed policies and politics.
 
It is time for us to wake up before it is too late and to remind ourselves that a “stitch in time saves nine”.
 
Recently the Middle Class in Bangalore exploded many a myth about the BJP and Urban India by voting overwhelmingly for the BJP in the municipal polls. This should be taken as an opportunity for the BJP to distinguish itself in the area of Local Governance.  An important area of Urban Local Governance is Security and Police reforms. Unless Institutional reforms focused on building capacity we cannot win the war against Maoists or Islamists and the stray un-Hindu terrorist.
 
As a demonstration of your commitment to Good Governance the BJP should pledge to distinguish itself as the Party for Institutional Refors and the Party of Local Governance. 
 
Please pledge that you are ready to make tough political choices so we can bring in the Institutional Reforms we need urgently. 

Let us not forget what the experts are saying. The UPA is spending its way out of the gains of the last economic boom. Without Institutional Reforms there is little hope of incubating the next economic boom. Without either of these we will not be able to afford the welfare schemes needed to help the poorest of the poor for Antyodya.
 
With these words I enjoin you to think of  yourselves as a Lobby for Excellence as Arun Shourieji puts it and strive to dispel the “chalta hai” mindset in Governance and spread the message “ab nahi chalega”.

Regards

Filed under: ABIDE Bangalore, betrayal of aam admi, DesiPundit, economic freedom, Gujarat Polls 2007, India Elections 2009, jeetega-bharat, Karnataka Polls 2008, Local Governance, Narendra Modi, Nitin Gadkari, UPA-II Critical Appraisal

RSS Now Playing on Offstumped Live

  • On Third Front day dreams and Uttar Pradesh nightmares – Wrap up Podcast March 14, 2012
    A podcast conversation with  @dubash (http://phalaka.com) where we wrap up the Uttar Pradesh polls discussion with a look at the final numbers and analysis of vote shares. We also look ahead on all the buzz around Akhilesh Yadav, the rise of the Samajwadi Party and all of the day-dreaming over a possible Third Front Government [...]
    admin

Live Tweets

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 6,670 other followers

Offstumped Archives

Disclaimer

Opinions expressed on this site using the alias Offstumped are the blogger's personal opinions and do not in any way reflect the views of the blogger's Employers.