Offstumped – Commentary on Indian Politics

Icon

Politics and Public Policy in India

Hyderabad riots, Political flux in Andhra and BJP’s Telangana stance – OpEd in Pioneer

Originally published in The Pioneer. Also published earlier in Pioneer my challenge to the BJP to make the case for Telangana to rest of Andhra.

Background reading for this Column

The reactions from Muslim groups and MIM linking Sangareddy violence to Mahububnagar can be found here and here. Business Standard has a good summary of political turmoil within AP Congress. and the India Today on the Reddy Hindu Identity rhetoric from Congress. The BJP’s booklet on case for Telangana to Seemandhra residents can be found here.

(Also see bottom of the blog for  tailpiece on Beef controversy at Osmania University)

One of film actresses, Urmila Matondkar’s early breaks in the Telugu movie industry was a Ram Gopal Verma movie called Gaayam made in 1993. The movie also featured Revathi and a less nationally known male lead actor,Jagapathi Babu. While much of the storyline is said to have been inspired by The Godfather and other Western sources, there was an element of factual reality closer home on how communal riots were engineered in Hyderabad to force a Chief Minister out.

Hyderabad was witness to a series of incidents of communal rioting between 1990 and 1992 even as dissidence within the Congress saw three different Congress Chief Ministers within that span of three years. The strong correlation between weak Congress Chief Ministers in Andhra Pradesh and communal violence in Hyderabad is not limited to the early 1990s. Between 1980 and 1983, Andhra Pradesh saw a similar parade of weak Congress Chief Ministers being swapped from New Delhi and a highly controversial Congress-engineered coup against NT Rama Rao in 1984, with some of the worst incidents of communal rioting in Hyderabad.

Growing up as a child in Hyderabad, watching news of curfew being imposed onDoordarshan, was a favourite pastime, for one of our Mathematics teachers would invariably have to skip showing up to work. Curfew in Hyderabad those days meant there was always the outside chance of either school being closed or a free period. The incidents of communal rioting in Hyderabad were not funny anymore as we grew up to come to terms with its grim reality in the early 1990s. During the 1990 violence another Mathematics teacher was booked under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act and put away without bail, for the only crime of being a Hindu in his twenties in an area of the old city that saw violence against Muslims.

Hyderabad once again in the past week saw deliberately provoked incidents of communal violence. Some have attempted to attribute it to VHP leader Pravin Togadia’s earlier presence in that city, which in the opinion of this columnist is a naïve and superficial reading of the dynamics that are shaping up in Andhra Pradesh. The State once again is witness to a weak Congress Chief Minister with no real base. There are a number of powerful lobbies of current and former Congressmen that have been at the receiving end of a variety of court and CBI interventions with their commercial interests around Hyderabad and political interests elsewhere under threat. Last but not the least there is a new political dynamic that is emerging that is unsettling many from the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen to the Telangana Rashtra Samithi.

The communal incidents of the past week in Hyderabad must not be seen in isolation given the anxiety expressed by the MIM and other Muslim groups even before these incidents. Sangareddy, about 50km to the west of Hyderabad, saw communal incidents in the weeks leading up to the incidents in Hyderabad. In both Sangareddy and Hyderabad, there was deliberate provocation in the name of insult to religious symbols of one kind or another. But what is curious is the line pushed by the MIM and the so-called Muslim civil rights groups, both of whom linked the communal flare-up to the BJP’s surprise win in a bypoll election to the State Assembly in a different district of the Telangana region — Mahabubnagar.

The Congress and the Telugu Desam Party have declined in the Telangana region for some time now over the T-State issue. What is, however, interesting about the Mahabubnagar contest is that it was the first time that there was a competitive election between pro-Telangana parties since the movement for joint political action for a separate Telangana State emerged. The margin of victory for the BJP in Mahabubnagar may have been narrow, but it is significant that the BJP managed to hold its own against the TRS in a Telangana seat with a large concentration of Muslim population. Hence, the angst of the MIM and other Muslim groups is highly understandable.

This columnist had many months back lamented that the movement in support of a separate Telangana State had to first make its case to the rest of Andhra. This columnist had also lamented that, despite the churning in Andhra politics and the fragmentation of political parties, the BJP had failed to produce a leader who could reach beyond the regional divide to chart a new course. This past week the BJP’s young chief in Andhra Pradesh, G Kishan Reddy, released a 14 page booklet in Telugu, making a direct socio-economic case to the people of Rayalseema and Andhra on why a regional bifurcation of the State would not hurt their interest but instead create new opportunity. It was heartening to see him actually take up the challenge of making a positive case for Telangana to the rest of Andhra by touring both regions.

It is too early to say if the BJP’s Mahabubnagar win was an anomaly or a leading indicator of the undercurrents in play in Telangana. One thing is, however, clear: The political ferment within the Congress in Andhra has reached its rotten limit, with factions going at each other within the party and beyond. Chandrababu Naidu’s Telugu Desam Party seems to also be scripting its path to increasing irrelevance with its failure to take a clear stance on Telangana while continuing to be mired in family feuds within NTR’s extended family.

The political environment in Andhra Pradesh is in a flux, putting a State that sends the highest number of Congress MPs in play for the first time in decades, opening up the possibility of a new configuration to emerge.

How far the BJP will gain in this environment, is an open question, but it may have found a new rising star in young Kishan Reddy who has shown a proclivity for engaging on policy issues in the past and has now shown the conviction to take a bold and enlightened stance on the Telangana issue.

Tailpiece on Beef controversy in Osmania University

The Beef controversy in Osmania University is unfortunate. It is one thing to argue a case for the private right to consumer beef quite another to make a public spectacle out of it with the deliberate aim of drawing controversy. The ABVP too has acted foolishly walking into the trap here resulting in violence on campus. Between the Telangana issue and these contrived controversies it is an open question what kind of academics gets done in Osmania University these days. This entire sequence of events is another reason why organized politics on campus needs to be clamped down completely. The IITs have the most meaningful model for student governance within the campus where there is room for robust debate and democracy but without any role for political parties.

On the Beef issue without getting into the Historical context and the geographical differences on attitudes towards it suffices to say the following:

Most legislation in India is against commercial Cow slaughter and transportation and trade facilitating it. It is a slippery slope to go from this position to attempt to Criminalize the Possession or Consumption of Beef.

It is just as well in a Federal polity like India for a Local Community or state  to prohibit cow slaughter or commerce around it while other states and communities retain the right to not do so.

Beyond this any arguments against Private Consumption of Beef need to be in the socio-cultural realm with no role for Politics or Government.

Also read on the same topic from Offstumped Archives 2008 – Flat World Hindutva on Individual Freedom and Socio-economic choice and on Liberty and Licentiousness.

Filed under: federalism, Flat World Hindutva, Offstumped, Telangana

National Reconciliation – Part 2

Before getting into this post:

First read these posts on the need for a visible and demonstrable move on reconciliation:

#1 A Saffron Perestroika

#2 A Game Changer

And then read this post on – National Reconciliation Part 1 as the starting point for this process.

 

At the risk of reducing these words of caution to a cliche, let is be said one more time that “India cannot afford another lost decade”.

For far too long Demographic Fault-lines have been used as a Political wedge issue. It is time to make deft political moves, that will over time permanently bury these demographic fault lines. We lament corruption yet we fail to recognize that when immoral politics are accorded moral sanction using Identity as a wedge, such corruption is an inevitable outcome.

For far too long the Muslim Community in India has been  emotionally blackmailed into voting out of fear even if it meant voting against the socio-economic interests of many within the Muslim community. Make no mistake today’s orders by the Supreme Court, will be twisted to pursue even greater fear mongering, in upcoming state elections – especially the all important Uttar Pradesh assembly elections. The moment calls for creative and imaginative political moves to ensure the process of reconciliation takes a visible and concrete shape.

A dialogue must begin on why the Indian Muslim Community must always condemn itself to voting out of fear.

A dialogue must also begin on why the Indian Muslim Community, in doing so, must continue to hurt its economic interests while patronizing vested interests who use that fear as a wedge to sustain themselves politically.

Shifting Demographics pose a challenge but also present an opportunity. The demographic challenge must be taken head on to make its many fault-lines irrelevant.  Our response to shifting demographics must not be more vote bank politics. Our response has to be to make politics that uses demographic identity as a wedge, less and less relevant.

Ultimately this is about Leadership and social change. Our ancient history is testimony to how sagacious leadership can help forge a compact that will not just ensure lasting reconciliation but will help create a new order.

In closing we must recollect that ancient compact forged byVashishtha and Pulastya that has manifested in all that we understand to be Hinduism today. The former lost his son, the latter many of his kinsmen. Both found it within themselves to strive for reconciliation that not just buried ancient animosities but resulted in the creation of a new way of life – modern for its times. The Vishnu Purana stands testimony to that ancient compact forged by Vashishtha and Pulastya through the twin agencies of Vashishtha’s grandson Parashara for authorship and Pulastya for divine insight.

To keep our way of life going, modern India needs another such compact. Hope leadership emerges that draws from Vashishtha and Pulastya’s sagacity and wisdom to find ways to permanently bury these fault-lines.

Filed under: Advani Yatra against Corruption, Ambedkarite Constitutionalism, Anna Hazare, Assembly elections 2011, उत्तर प्रदेश २०१२, Baba Ramdev, Flat World Hindutva, Internet Hindus, Narendra Modi, Nitin Gadkari, Shveta Chhatra, UPA-II Critical Appraisal, Uttar Pradesh Polls 2012, Varun Gandhi, War on Terror

Saffron Perestroika

The time for a Saffron Perestroika is now.

It is now crystal clear that the BJP’s permanent Delhi based leadership is essentially presiding over a super regional party. This permanent Delhi based leadership is incapable of ensuring the party breaks new ground. What is worse, in the few states where the BJP did hold ground in the 1990s despite not being either the primary or the secondary political player – the BJP has seen its base shrink over the last two or three election cycles. Today the BJP is a bit player in these states as well on the verge of grand political irrelevance. In the grand prize called Uttar Pradesh a similar scenario is all set to be played as well.

The current strategy of linear vote growth has shown its limitations. Those who fantasize of a grand anti-congress umbrella platform need a serious dose of  reality on why exactly would the BJP be the rallying point for such an umbrella platform. The wins by Mamata in Bengal and Jayalalitha in Tamil Nadu (previously by Maya in UP and Naveen in Orissa) have shown that the BJP is not even a factor in their local political calculus unlike in the case of an Akali Dal in Punjab or a JD-U in Bihar.

There is no linear path to 2014 and the BJP in its current avatar has outlived its usefulness as a national entity.

It is time to put together a blueprint for a new version 3.0.

For that to happen, a mandatory pre-requisite however is the retirement of the BJP’s patriarch and the setting in motion of a process by which change is effected in the leadership through an open and transparent internal election that sees a real contest of ideas rather than the coronation of an individual. There is no doubt that the BJP needs purposeful, transformational leadership that suffers no fools and brooks no nonsense with a single minded focus on clearing out the deadwood and infusing fresh blood. There is also no doubt that there is only one leader who fits the bill.

Despite that a contest of ideas is imperative over a coronation, for the blueprint for version 3.0 has to be based on localization. Local ideas, local metaphors and local issues must bubble up to result in a federal platform. For that happen there has to be a nationwide contest of ideas where the primary contenders assuming there are more than one, make their case in every nook and corner of the country. When the contest is settled it would not have been a decision thrust by a permanent leadership sitting in Delhi brokering a backroom deal, but it would be the result of the sum total of all local interests and aspirations.

Ultimately this localization would come to mean state units making their own decisions on winnability through a direct process of  feedback from the ground rather than the current process of  decision making by High Commands in Delhi who are mostly divorced from local realities.

A blue-print for version 3.0 emerging from this process could be a national coalition of local interests bound together by a shared belief in and commitment to Constitutionalism and Federalism. As a consequence this national coalition will sharply differentiate itself from the UPA by arguing in favor of

#1 freedom and autonomy to states and local government in socio-economic decision making

#2 the federalization and localization of welfare spending

#3 systemic reforms in law enforcement and justice delivery while minimizing the discretionary powers of the Central Government and the Supreme Court  to intervene in violation of Federalism and the Constitutional separation of powers

#4 a time bound framework for Reconciliation of all of last century’s contentious issues and last decade’s wounds

#5 a Vision to advance India’s strategic interests with clear linkages to economic interests of states

While #1 and #2 will help mark a clear space that is opposed to the UPA’s current drift of centralization and statism they will also help solidify the basic premise of version 3.0 which is Localization. The political incentives for #3 will come from the fact that many regions have been subjected to arbitrary central interventions motivated by politics. It is imperative that version 3.0 also transcend the fault-lines that defined version 2.0 and to shed the baggage from version 2.0, thus #4 becomes critical. While #5 is the pathway to ensuring there is regional buy-in and ownership for a strong advocacy of Strategic Interests without holding such advocacy hostage to regional issues and identity polemics.

The blueprint for version 3.0 that emerges from these 5 elements would be

a vision of a Strong Republic that provides for economic freedom and autonomy to states and local government  guaranteed by strong Constitutional Institutions for Law Enforcement and Justice Delivery

a.k.a.

Minimum Government Maximum Governance

Continuing Twitter commentary:

Filed under: Ambedkarite Constitutionalism, Assembly elections 2011, betrayal of aam admi, economic freedom, Flat World Hindutva, Internet Hindus, Local Governance, Narendra Modi, Nitin Gadkari, Shveta Chhatra, socio-economic engineering

How to keep the Toilet clean ?

General Notice: If to some readers, this post appears to be without context then please ignore.

Much of the angst within a section on twitter discussing political issues comes down to this series of questions.

The debate on labels, ideology and identity in Politics can be dumbed down to this central question – How to keep the toilet clean ?

Rest of the exchange follows from this initial exchange

And a closing reference in this exchange to what happened a year back

“The lack of awareness and sensitivity to where our enlightened self interest lies is endemic. In recent days this blogger was privy to a similar moral ambivalence albeit on a microscopic scale where many moderate and otherwise well-meaning voices failed to find within themselves where their self-interest lies to stand up to Internet Anarchists.”

And so the debate continues…..

PS: One closing thought to those who argue about wearing Identity with pride as an ideological label. They forget that pride is no assurance that the toilet will be clean or how it will be cleaned. There in lies the fallacy of using Identity to define one’s politics for you will end up voting as a proud Hindu to those who are quite comfortable with a dirty toilet as long as Hindu pride is preserved.

Filed under: Flat World Hindutva, Internet Hindus, Two Indias

RSS Now Playing on Offstumped Live

  • On Third Front day dreams and Uttar Pradesh nightmares – Wrap up Podcast March 14, 2012
    A podcast conversation with  @dubash (http://phalaka.com) where we wrap up the Uttar Pradesh polls discussion with a look at the final numbers and analysis of vote shares. We also look ahead on all the buzz around Akhilesh Yadav, the rise of the Samajwadi Party and all of the day-dreaming over a possible Third Front Government [...]
    admin

Live Tweets

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 6,670 other followers

Offstumped Archives

Disclaimer

Opinions expressed on this site using the alias Offstumped are the blogger's personal opinions and do not in any way reflect the views of the blogger's Employers.