Offstumped – Commentary on Indian Politics

Icon

Politics and Public Policy in India

Celebrating K. Subrahmanyam

I have often wondered which word in Sanskrit most accurately reflects “strategy”. Rana-niti refers to battlefield tactics. Then there is vyuha which refers to a formation. Recalling a conversation between K. Subhramanyam and George Tanham of the RAND Corporation, Journalist Inder Malhotra had this to say:

came to see Subbu when he was doing a study on Indian strategic thought. Subbu told him, “What can I say about something that doesn’t exist?”
It is strange that the land that produced the oldest precursors of the most popular modern day strategy games Chess, failed to sustain its traditions and schools of Strategic Thinking for so  many centuries.  Somewhere along the line we became argumentative Indians who will split hair endlessly on futile squabbles while losing the big picture to the detriment of our own strategic interests.  
 
The tradition of strong Institutions and selfless Institution Builders who would look out for the long term interests of this great land of ours was almost lost and forgotten. That tradition which once at its zenith had produced Kautilya’s Arthashastra and Takshashila saw a new beginning in the last decade of the 20th century.
 
We must celebrate K. Subrahmanyam’s life as a key moment in the revival of that ancient tradition of strong Institutions and selfless Institution Builders who would look out for the interests of this Nation, far beyond the myopic eye can see.
 
Some excellent writing on his life by S Varadarajan, Rohan and a must read and listen interview (podcast) by Nitin Pai.
 
This touching note by his grandson Dhruva.

Filed under: historical, jeetega-bharat, Shveta Chhatra

Vibrant Gujarat – Putting your money where your mouth is

The indisputable topic for this festive season across media outlets is Gujarat’s Vibrancy. It is not that this season is without the usual whining and intellectual skullduggery. Nevertheless a distinctively different tone is visible in the op-ed columns – case in point this one in the Financial Express and this in Wall Street Journal.

The rest of us Political junkies can go on endlessly on whether or not amends have been made for 2002 but Gujarat has moved on for its own sake leaving us far behind with our hair splitting arguments and burdened conscience.

When I say moved on, let me be clear and specific Gujarat has moved on far ahead of the rest of India.

Here is why:

#1 – The debate in Gujarat is no longer about how to provide 24×7 electricity but on how to make it clean, sustainable and green.

#2 – The debate in Gujarat is no longer about achieving the least common denominator in public education but on how to make it accountable and performant.

#3 – The debate in Gujarat is no longer about talk of eliminating corruption in governance but on how to make the processes of governance responsive, citizen centric with a firm focus on service delivery.

#4 – The debate in Gujarat is no longer about clearing the backlog of cases but on how to further the innovations in Justice delivery making them more sensitive and efficient.

#5 - The debate on Gujarat is no longer in Gujarat but elsewhere as conventional wisdom is being challenged and complacency in Governance is being questioned. 

In the final analysis hair splitting arguments over Narendra Modi’s viability nationally have become irrelevant. The process of Justice on 2002 must and will take its course. But Gujarat’s bounty has created the environment for socio-political healing.

Gujarat has demonstrated how to turn the corner, create opportunity for everyone thus providing a template to the rest of India on looking to the future with positive aspirations rather than be dragged down by the negative emotions of the past.

Perhaps all those who swear by economic freedom should consider putting their money where their mouth is on the one state where the Spirit of Enterprise has decisively defeated the Culture of Entitlement.

I for one am seriously contemplating living in one of India’s best managed Cities come 2012.

Filed under: Ambedkarite Constitutionalism, economic freedom, Gujarat Polls 2007, jeetega-bharat, Local Governance, Narendra Modi, Nitin Gadkari, Shveta Chhatra, socio-economic engineering, Two Indias, Uncategorized

Open Letter to Shri Mohan Bhagwat

Dear Shri Bhagwatji

It is with great concern I write this open letter as a well wisher and as someone who has seen the Sangh closely from the age of 3.

It is abundantly clear that a dangerous political game is being played over the issue of alleged incidents of terror betwen 2006-2008 that selectively and exclusively targeted Muslims and Muslim places of Worship. There is no doubt selectively information has been leaked to the media even before the process of Justice has followed its natural course in the Courts of Law.

I have read the various press releases on these selective leaks and also media reports on the legal notice that was issued earlier today. The Sangh has legitimately raised several legal questions.

However Bhagawatji this issue is of significance that goes far beyond nuanced, hair splitting legal arguments.

There are real threats to this Nation of ours from Islamist Terrorists who have been aided and abetted by Pakistan and who have thrived on the victimhood resulting from cynical vote bank politics. There are also real threats from Maoist Terrorists who have thrived on the limited capacity of the Indian State.

In dealing with these threats we have time and again called upon the Indian State to act with Moral Certitude, Intellectual Clarity while not giving in to extraneous political and ideological considerations. We have also called from the Grammar of Justice to prevail over the Grammar Blackmail or Anarchy. It does immense damage to our moral high ground in dealing with these anti-national Terrorists if we are not seen as being even handed and consistent in our response to all acts of Terror irrespective of cause or consequence.

There is however an even larger issue here with the potential to cause severe and irreversible damage to the Sangh.

It is abundantly clear that on more than one ocassion certain individuals swearing by Hindutva have committed Adharma. Their actions have tainted the sacred Saffron by dragging into the political realm. The Sangh has failed to unambiguously and visibly denounce such Individuals and Acts. It doesnt matter how sound a legal argument the Sangh forwards, the battle to win hearts and influence minds is being lost every time the Sangh equivocates and speaks in generalities.

Sir there is a new demographic generation that is coming of age in India. This generation is impatient for change and is unbounded in its aspirations. This generation needs leadership and direction. But more importantly this generation sees its aspirations linked to a growing economy.

Sir there is a grave risk of this entire generation being lost to the Sangh on account of the Sangh’s failure to go beyond hair splitting arguments to visibly denounce specific acts of Adharma and to articulate a larger cause and vision that relates to their aspirations.

The arrests in the Malegaon, Mecca Masjid, Ajmer Sharif and Samjhauta Express blasts are a defining moment for the Sangh to make bold and  game changing moves.

Hence Sir, I call upon you as the SarSanghachalak to consider the following 3 points:

#1 – Acknowledge that Adharma has been committed by some in the name of Hindutva

#2 – Demand Accountability for all such acts of Adharma committed in the name of Hindutva from individuals within the Sangh, organizations loosely affiliated with the Sangh and also in the Courts of Law

#3 – Set a an example and a high bar through a clear and visible public purge of such individuals from all association with the Sangh.

#4 – Make the first move towards National Reconciliation with an unwavering  commitment despite any political provocations from the Congress

Doing this Sir may not stop the Congress from playing the cynical and dangerous game of vote bank politics it is indulging in.

But Sir this will set the Sangh distinctly apart as an organization that is above politics in the eyes of this very important generation that will come to shape the destiny of this country next few decades.

And one last thought Sir.

 There is an urgent need to move the discourse on Hindu interests away from victimhood, fears and paranoia. There is an urgent need to build Strong Institutions that will look out for Hindu interests and will uphold Dharma for not just this generation but the next many generations. The Sangh can play a crucial role in setting the direction and in nurturing these Institutions to produce the modern day equivalent of a 1000 Kautilyas in a Takshashila of the 21st Century.

Sir this urgent task of Institution Building cannot be achieved by pursuing street politics and agitations on fears real or imagined that play on Hindu Victimhood.

This Institution Building Sir can only happen when Hindu Institutions and Temples like the Tirumala Tirupathu Devasthanam and others are freed from Government control and from the stranglehold of politicians. It is time Sir these Hindu Institutions have been restored to Hindu Civil Society in a Private Trusteeship model and the Sangh can play an important role in bringing together Hindu Civil Society towards this cause. If Hindu Institutions like TTD start investing their resources towards Hindu causes much of the victimhood arising from Proselytization and Immigration will cease.

Sir in closing let me just say there is only one Hindu cause worth fighting for and it is to free Hindu Temples and Institutions from State Control. It is time we invested for the future and towards making Dharma relevant to life in the 21st Century.

regards

Shashi Shekhar

Filed under: Dharma-debates, Dharmayudh-2009, jeetega-bharat, War on Terror, Shveta Chhatra, UPA-II Critical Appraisal, Internet Hindus, economic freedom

BJP Convention on Good Governance – Open Letter

Governance is not about running welfare schemes

Governance is about making the Institutions of the State deliver

all the time everytime for everyone

The BJP is holding a first of its kind National Convention on Good Governance at the Rambhau Mhalgi Prabodhini’s Knowledge-Excellence Centre at Bhainder near Mumbai between June 5th and and 6th 2010.

The convention was announced by former Goa CM and fellow IIT Mumba alumnus Manohar Parrikar who was also recently appointed as convenor of the BJP’s Governance cell.

The convention will be attended by Chief Ministers of BJP ruled states and others from NDA ruled states with Narendra Modi set to deliver the keynote.

Following is an Open Letter from Offstumped to the attendees of the Convention.

Dear BJP Chief Ministers and Leaders focused on Good Governance

As you get together in Mumbai to discuss Good Governance, I am reminded of a poem by an American Poet Ogden Nash.

The poem is titled “A Stitch too late is my fate” and builds on the famous proverb “a stitch in time saves nine” alluding to the Middle Class ethic of planning ahead to secure tomorrow.

I want to expand on this Middle Class ethic in the Indian Context and more specifically on why I think Institutional Reform must be the center piece of any agenda on Good Governance. I want to also highlight that without that Institutional Reform we will fail to chart the future for Young India.
  
Arun Shourieji writing in his latest book has given that profound message an Indian Context that all of us must reflect on.
 
Shourieji says that an extremely high price the country paid for starting the reforms late. And even these late reforms have taken place only in economic policy and not in administration and governance. Reforms in these fields are stonewalled because politicians don’t want to commit harakiri. One major problem before the country is the plethora of small parties who have their own narrow agendas and no national vision. Combined with the corrupt section of the business class, they derail even essential reforms. Shourie suggests that to bring about these mandatory changes, what is needed is a lobby for excellence.

There has been a lot of debate in our political world on the priorities of Government. Unlike Vajpayeeji’s NDA Government, Manmohan Singhji’s government has placed a higher priority on what it calls “Aam Admi” policies which have come at the expense of real development oriented reforms.
 
This government’s motto has been to postpone politically tough real reforms.
 
Instead this government has avoided the political challenges to pursue what at best can be called “feel good” policies by taking the easy way out of populism, thus postponing real reforms.
 
Unless we think “a stitch time in saves nine” we cannot muster the will for real Institutional reform .
 
I have no hesitation in saying that the BJP’s mission of Antyodaya cannot be realised unless there are Institutional reforms that make the system work all the time and everytime for everyone and not just the “Last Man Standing in the Queue”. 
 
It is only in a system that works all the time and for everyone can the poorest of poor be helped without being at the mercy of opportunistic politics.
 
This can only happen if Institutional Reform focuses on the areas of Economy, Local Governance and Education.
 
The UPA government has been very succesful in its pursuits of feel-good politics.
 
Thus a Right to Education bill is passed without real reform in maximizing educational opportunities for everyone through public and private means.
 
Tomorrow a Right to Food bill is being contemplated which too is aimed at making us all feel good without any real reform on the wastage and inefficiencies in the Public Distribution System.
 
Learned Policy Experts who are neutral and not associated with any political party have in recent days analyzed and exposed the fallacies of the UPA’s feel good policies.
 
Pratap Bhanu Mehtaji writing in the Indian Express has cautioned us on what he calls the diversionary tactics of the Government in ignoring Price rise and inflation which in part could have been contributed by the very same feel good policies touted by the Government from NREGA to the loan waivers.
 
Bibek Debroyji also writing in the Indian Express has also reminded us of the many failed promises of the UPA on reforms in the Food sector and how the UPA has failed accurately identify the Poor.
 
If there is one consistent message from these politically neutral experts, it is that the UPA’s feel good policies are deeply flawed and have come at the expense of real Institutional Reforms.
 
It is this postponement of reforms that has jeopardized our economic future as Pratap Bhanu Mehtaji puts it impacting not just the welfare schemes for the poor but also the costs of Education and other public services for the Middle Class.
 
Neutral experts are warning us that the Economic Success of past 2 decades the seeds of which were sown by Narasimha Raoji and which was harvested by Vajpayeeji’s government is at a grave risk on account of the UPA’s flawed policies and politics.
 
It is time for us to wake up before it is too late and to remind ourselves that a “stitch in time saves nine”.
 
Recently the Middle Class in Bangalore exploded many a myth about the BJP and Urban India by voting overwhelmingly for the BJP in the municipal polls. This should be taken as an opportunity for the BJP to distinguish itself in the area of Local Governance.  An important area of Urban Local Governance is Security and Police reforms. Unless Institutional reforms focused on building capacity we cannot win the war against Maoists or Islamists and the stray un-Hindu terrorist.
 
As a demonstration of your commitment to Good Governance the BJP should pledge to distinguish itself as the Party for Institutional Refors and the Party of Local Governance. 
 
Please pledge that you are ready to make tough political choices so we can bring in the Institutional Reforms we need urgently. 

Let us not forget what the experts are saying. The UPA is spending its way out of the gains of the last economic boom. Without Institutional Reforms there is little hope of incubating the next economic boom. Without either of these we will not be able to afford the welfare schemes needed to help the poorest of the poor for Antyodya.
 
With these words I enjoin you to think of  yourselves as a Lobby for Excellence as Arun Shourieji puts it and strive to dispel the “chalta hai” mindset in Governance and spread the message “ab nahi chalega”.

Regards

Filed under: ABIDE Bangalore, betrayal of aam admi, DesiPundit, economic freedom, Gujarat Polls 2007, India Elections 2009, jeetega-bharat, Karnataka Polls 2008, Local Governance, Narendra Modi, Nitin Gadkari, UPA-II Critical Appraisal

RSS Now Playing on Offstumped Live

  • On Third Front day dreams and Uttar Pradesh nightmares – Wrap up Podcast March 14, 2012
    A podcast conversation with  @dubash (http://phalaka.com) where we wrap up the Uttar Pradesh polls discussion with a look at the final numbers and analysis of vote shares. We also look ahead on all the buzz around Akhilesh Yadav, the rise of the Samajwadi Party and all of the day-dreaming over a possible Third Front Government [...]
    admin

Live Tweets

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 6,670 other followers

Offstumped Archives

Disclaimer

Opinions expressed on this site using the alias Offstumped are the blogger's personal opinions and do not in any way reflect the views of the blogger's Employers.