Much fury has ensued over the alleged Mining Scam in Karnataka. The Ombdusman Mr. Santosh Hegde has not done himself much good with frequent emotional outbursts and the soundbites to the media well before the formal submission of the report being prepared by him. The episode in many ways calls to question the efficacy of the Institution of an Ombudsman against Corruption independent of the Government.
Mr. Hegde is accountable to none for his conduct in the media circus that has ensued before and after the leak.
Mr. Hegde is also accountable to none for his role in activism in Delhi with the Anna Hazare camp and the Congress President lead NAC while he was at the same investigating the BJP lead government in Karnataka.
Mr. Hegde will also be accountable to none long after he leaves office on whether his report mixed up the political with the criminal, the unethical with the illegal.
But this is post is not about Mr. Hegde but this post is about the BJP’s brazen strategy in Karnataka.
When this blogger first sought to draw a distinction between the unethical and the illegal in Karnataka it was to make the argument that even though Mr. Yeddyurappa’s actions were not illegal they were still unethical and hence merited corrective action. In a clever word play the BJP in the many weeks since the controversy first erupted turned that distinction on its head to argue that no action was required.
There was always going to be a short window of political opportunity to draw nuances between the unethical and the illegal. Wisdom would have dictated that having opened such a window of opportunity, the BJP could have made changes in Karnataka at a time and pace of its choosing thus avoiding the present situation. Instead it is now stuck defending that nuance in the face of a high decibel media campaign where all distinctions blur thus reducing its political campaign against corruption to a Zero Sum Game.
BJP’s politics in the states that have come to become its strongholds has followed a familiar trajectory where leaders who represented legitimate social interests had to over time make way for performers who then went on to consolidate power by delivering on Governance. This trajectory was witnessed in the transition from Keshubhai to Narendra Modi, Uma Bharati to Shivraj Chauhan and Shekhawat to Raje.
That Mr. Yeddyurrapa as a Leader represents real social interests in Karnataka is undisputed. But he also clearly lacks a temperament for Governance which is evident from his frequent emotional outbursts and his frequent invoking of god and places of faith. BJP was right to not have engineered a change via high command diktat from Delhi in the absence of a legitimate challenge to Mr. Yeddyurappa within the Legislative Party.
However the window of opportunity to capitalize on nuances is fast closing.
BJP in Karnataka needs its Narendra Modi who will clean up the Party and Government of special interests. It doesn’t matter if it is a “he” or a “she”, as long as that succession happens soon.
Filed under: Anna Hazare, Baba Ramdev, Karnataka Polls 2008, Narendra Modi, Nitin Gadkari
Comments