It was good to see Narendra Modi emerge as the most credible voice to challenge the Nehru-Gandhi monopoly on public debate. The theatrics of putting Sonia Gandhi on the spot for the Bhopal bungling apart, the upcoming political battle will be in large measure between the Left Liberalization and NGO-ization of Governance by the Congress and the Narendra Modi philosophy of Good Governance.
Niranjan Rajadhyaskha has an interesting piece in the Mint on how NREGA may be driving liquor sales up in Rural Andhra. The most compelling remarks in the piece are
Unfortunately, the current fashion is to judge public policy choices based on good intentions rather than desirable outcomes.
Have welfare programmes led to a rise in inflation? Are men using their extra cash to buy liquor rather than send children to school? Should welfare programmes be targeted at women rather than men? Will reserved seats for women really change public policy choices? Has the rural jobs scheme raised rural wages without raising rural productivity?
Questions such as these are seen as mere irritants in an alliance that is run by a Congress party that believes in grand gestures—public policy as a morality play. The new National Advisory Council, too, is packed with do-gooders in a hurry, unhindered by constitutional or budgetary constraints
The record auction for the right to sell liquor in the rural areas of Andhra Pradesh could be a good reason to start some debate on what the new welfare programmes are actually doing to development possibilities on the ground.
A key element of that battle will be to force into public debate the questions that Mr. Rajadyaksha has raised on the Congress’ flawed approach to welfare.
There is nothing “Hindu” about the economics David Frawely attemps to pass off with a saffron hue. Frawley makes no mention the rich Indian tradition of Arthashastra or the more recent philosophical views of C.R. Rajagopalachari. In not doing so he exposes himself to having little or no understanding of what could rightly have been called “Hindu Economics, statecraft or realism” (For a good summary of that tradition from Arthashastra to Sukraniti read Mckenzie Brown’s White Umbrella – Indian Political Thought from Manu to Gandhi).
In fact Frawley’s piece betrays the worst kept secret that, minus the lip service to Hindutva, many of the saffron persuasion have much in common with the West’s Left Liberals when it comes to economic issues.
As Mr. Modi prepares to challenge the UPA’s Left Liberalization and NGO-ization of Governance, his bigger challenge will be to clear the confusion on economic issues within the family as is manifest in Frawley’s piece. Political success of P2G2 will in large measure depend on driving that much needed coherence.
PS: Offstumped will return late July/early August.
- Where is the BJP on this proposed universalisation of entitlements – street protests and illegal bandhs no substitute to policy alternatives
- Make no mistake Indian Express is batting for Sonia Gandhi and the radicals in NAC on universalisation of entitlements http://j.mp/blY6Eg
- Question to NAC – does Universalisation of Entitlements without qualifications, now include Maoist Terrorists http://bit.ly/9uPKvL
- Who will challenge Sonia Gandhi by Meghnad Desai - We http://j.mp/9Y2B2V
- Telegraph describes Sonia Gandhi’s views on Food Security as “radical” http://j.mp/dqsqw3 this NAC thing is turning out to be entertaining
- Rediff says there was unanimity on universal rural PDS, Hindu says consensus eludes and the Telegraph says the radicals were beaten back
- There are as many versions on who won the battle on Food Security in the NAC as there are members in the NAC
- Dear NAC you are neither an eGOM nor a Parliamentary Committee http://is.gd/dbFnQ
- The NAC is quite candid about its core mission being NGOization of governance check out the new website http://nac.nic.in
- So what is the cost to tax payer on the “National Advisory Council” http://is.gd/dby4h interesting it is camouflaged within PMO’s expenses
- Whats next on the agenda for Left-Liberalization and NGOization of Governance http://is.gd/dbxEq
- Dear Left Libs on National Advisory Council how come law and order is not a state subject on matters other than terror http://bit.ly/brWDFA
- Should we take it that Sonia Gandhi is really worried about Narendra Modi in 2014 that she has NAC Left Libs working overtime on this bill
- Old Left Lib trick to title laws in a way that average uninformed mind asks “what can be wrong with a law to prevent communal violence”
- The truth however is the law has nothing to do with real policing to prevent violence, merely creates another Delhi based conscience keeper
- Rule of Thumb – when unelected Left Libs propose a law its to Institutionalize meddlesome role in affairs of State with no accountability
- If the UPA is serious about Communal Violence and Terror why doesn’t it make NREGS funds to states contingent upon police reforms
- Step further why won’t Left Libs on NAC propose using UID to deny NREGS & other entitlements from the State to the accused in Communal Riots
- Clever of Left Libs, misappropriating the label “civil society” http://is.gd/dsiG1 most are hardly civil & barely speak for all of society
- Look what NREGA is doing to farming enterprises in Tripura http://is.gd/e4Y3D and Tripura was recently celebrated as NREGA’s top performer
- NREGA’s tyranny on farmers http://is.gd/e4XM9 Dhanyavaad Sonia Gandhi for destroying the rural work ethic & rural enterprise simultaneously
- UPA’s warped Liberal values – Islamists have the freedom to escape diktats of the State on education, the rest of us dont have same freedom
- Its time to disabuse ourselves of the fantasy that RTE means “Right To Education” when in fact it really means “Regulating Education”
- Incredible Muslim Victimhood on display in the debate on RTE – can you believe a Secular Government sucked up to this narrative ?
- UPA Government says Muslims have no Right to Islamic Education http://is.gd/e4O8f exposes fallacy of a Rights based approach to education